The MSM seems to not understand the Mueller indictments yet. They are still catching up to the story, but their blinded bias is preventing clear sight.. It comes down to this:
The Russians wanted to create chaos in the US election. It is that simple.
Why?
Simple too.
If you wanted to bring the U.S. down how would you do it?
You can’t do it militarily.
You can’t do it economically. So what’s left?
You have to destroy it from within. That is the only way.
And that is what this is all about.
Create division, have people question legitimization and divide the nation.
The MSM still can’t see it. They are so anti Trump and simply cannot accept Hillary lost. The fact they are playing into the Russian desire is not evident to them.
Here’s a story that broke this AM on coverage of the anti Trump rally the Russians ran after the election and how CNN and MSM+NBC covered it:
“A check of their November 12 coverage showed both CNN and MSNBC gave enthusiastic coverage to the Russian-organized anti-Trump rally that day, with live reports every hour. Correspondents celebrated the idea that it was “a love rally,” and repeated the marchers’ anti-Trump mantras, such as: “We reject the President-elect.”
While the two liberal anti-Trump networks offered heavy coverage of the anti-Trump rally throughout the day, a check of coverage between noon and 5:00 p.m. Eastern found that the Fox News Channel offered only a short re-cap (66 seconds) at the start of their 4:00 p.m. Eastern hour.
Of course, none of the networks were aware of who was allegedly behind the march, but CNN and MSNBC reveled in the inflammatory messages of the march. At one point, MSNBC anchor Alex Witt credulously responded to the ridiculously alarmist rhetoric: “That woman, when she’s saying she’s concerned that black people will be shot in the street….Is that a legitimate concern for her? Because, that’s scary.”
Correspondent Morgan Radford cheerfully played along: “Alex, it’s not only a legitimate concern for her, it’s a legitimate concern for a lot of people I’ve spoken to….They’re wondering if this [Trump’s election] is almost a license to carry in terms of hate.”
Now remember what we told you yesterday. The Russians spent more money after the election than before (56%). Did you hear that on the MSM? How does this fact fit their collusion narrative?
Remember too that they apparently spent less a thousand dollars in the key states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The main stream news media question — “did they change the election outcome” is beyond credible.
At some point they should examine how they were mislead and fooled. Just don’t hold your breadth until they do.
Here’s a link to a great article by Byron York that outlines the Russian spend. It outlines full details. Did you hear any of this on the MSM?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-a-non-alarmist-reading-of-the-mueller-russia-indictment/article/2649445
NYT Coverage:
An example of media bias. Here are the B+NYT stories on the Mueller indictments which remember said no collusion for the Trump campaign.
Saturday the day it broke:
Monday:
You get the idea. Where is the story that says:
After 18 months of stories and coverage accusing the Trump campaign and the President himself of collusion the Mueller team finds no involvement and only Russian interference.
Reaction to yesterday’s blog
We took note this AM of the poll release that a majority of Americans want mental illness questions addressed immediately and gun control was second. That was followed by school security.
We outlined all three yesterday and if congress can’t listen to the people instead of staying in their lanes then we have an issue.
Let’s keep the pressure on and get all three done.
The Ratings:
No updates available.